Two federal judges in the same courthouse came to different opinions on whether AI firms are breaching copyrights, signaling ...

There are dozens of similar copyright lawsuits working through the courts right now, with cases filed against all the top ...

The first-of-its-kind ruling that condones AI training as fair use will likely be viewed as a big win for AI companies, but ...

The lawsuit is a win not just for Anthropic, but for all users of large language models.

Anthropic didn't violate U.S. copyright law when the AI company used millions of legally purchased books to train its chatbot ...

Anthropic used millions of books to train its AI, enraging authors, but a judge recently ruled in favor of the tech company, ...

Judge William Alsup determined that Anthropic training its AI models on purchased copies of books is fair use.

In a test case for the artificial intelligence industry, a federal judge has ruled that AI company Anthropic didn’t break the ...

In his ruling, Alsup claimed that, by training its LLM without the authors’ permission, Anthropic did not infringe on ...

Training Claude on copyrighted books it purchased was fair use, but piracy wasn't, the judge ruled.

Anthropic scanned and discarded millions of books to train its Claude AI assistant. It also used pirated content. Legal ...

A US federal judge ruled that using copyrighted books to train AI is fair use. Anthropic now faces trial over its use of ...