I know about next to nothing about Freebsd or any other bsd for that matter. I was looking around to see what it was, and this came up: Using FreeBSD as a desktop OS, you'd ultimately be using the ...

I've pretty much given up on using Windows 2000 and port forwarding to run my Webserver. Now I'm considering using FreeBSD to share my cable modem. You mentioned about port 21 forwarding to your win2k ...

FreeBSD has a reputation for being difficult, but using it as a daily driver showed me why that reputation misses the point.

Last month I started a series in which I try out different operating systems with the aim of using them for my everyday work, and my pick was Slackware 15, the latest version of the first Linux distro ...

In the past, many SMBs were content to let their Internet Service Providers (ISPs) handle e-mail services. But now they're interested in running mail servers onsite, due to the widespread adoption of ...

FreeBSD 15 isn’t flashy, but that is exactly why it works. Its stability, structure, and predictability make boring feel ...

FreeBSD and Slackware are both outstanding OSes. FreeBSD is more UNIX-like, while Slackware is more Linux-like. One is geared for servers, while the other is a bit more general. FreeBSD and Slackware.

FreeBSD doesn’t include a GUI desktop, but there is a way to install GNOME and give a user sudo privileges. FreeBSD is an outstanding platform. It’s about as reliable an operating system as you will ...